0:00
/

Miranda's Rescue: What Happened to the Dogs? An Interview with Jennifer Raymond

An interview with Jennifer Raymond about the discovery of buried dogs, the investigation that followed and the accountability of animal rescue organisations.

In Humboldt County, California, a rescue organisation that promised animals safety and sanctuary became the centre of a disturbing investigation after the discovery of dogs buried on its property.

Miranda’s Rescue had accepted animals from shelters, rescue organisations and individuals who believed they were giving those animals another chance. Some paid substantial sums for that assurance. But the discovery of the burial site raised serious questions about what had happened to dogs entrusted to its care, including animals whose original shelters had reportedly been told they were adopted.

Jennifer Raymond had been questioning the activities of Miranda’s Rescue for years. In March 2025, she took possession of a neighbouring property overlooking areas of the rescue that were not ordinarily visible to the public. From there, she began documenting what she observed.

Her investigation eventually led to the discovery of buried dogs. Jennifer and her colleague Jenna recovered eight bodies, including two puppies, and scanned them for microchips. Those identification records became an important part of tracing the animals back to the organisations that had transferred them.

A subsequent law enforcement investigation recovered many more animal remains.

In this interview, Jennifer describes the events that brought her to Miranda’s Rescue, the evidence she helped uncover and her continuing concerns about the treatment of animals held in rescue facilities.

We also examine a wider problem that Dog Desk Animal Action has encountered repeatedly in its international investigations: the absence of reliable, publicly accessible records showing what happens to animals after they enter institutional care.

The circumstances surrounding Miranda’s Rescue are the subject of a law enforcement investigation. Jennifer’s testimony includes her first hand observations, evidence she helped recover and allegations that must be distinguished from established findings.

But the questions raised by this case extend beyond the investigation itself.

What records should rescue organisations be required to maintain? Who verifies reported adoptions and transfers? What happens when concerns are raised repeatedly but meaningful intervention does not follow?

At Dog Desk Animal Action, we believe that accountability must follow an animal throughout its life, including when responsibility passes from one organisation to another. Rescue should never be the end of the paper trail.

Dog Desk Animal Action is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

Share

Discussion about this video

User's avatar

Ready for more?